Archive for August, 2011

Federal Law

30.08.2011
15:19
Comments Off on Federal Law

To determine the market value of property may be called an independent valuer. Engaging an independent appraiser is required to determine the price of purchase by the company from the shareholders of their shares in accordance with Article 76 of this Federal law, as well as in other cases stipulated by this Federal Law. In the case of determining the offering price of securities, the purchase price or bid price and bid price which is regularly published in the press involvement of an independent appraiser is not necessary, and to determine the market value of such securities should be taken into account, this purchase price or bid price and bid price. " 5. Smash-up of a business (Federal Law "On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)" dated October 26, 2002 127-FZ), Art. 111 "Sale of the debtor's property": "2.

Subject to compliance with the plan of the external control the debtor's property for sale – Unitary company or the debtor – the joint stock company, over twenty-five percent of the voting shares of which are state or municipal property, assessed by an independent appraiser with the idea conclusion of the state financial control body for the assessment. 3. The initial price of the property, put up for sale, established by the decision of the creditors meeting (the creditors' committee), pursuant to market value of property determined in accordance with the report of an independent appraiser, outsourcing manager and acting under contract with the payment for his services at the expense of the debtor's property. " Art. 129 "Powers of the bankruptcy trustee," part 2 "2. The bankruptcy administrator shall … engage an independent appraiser to assess the debtor's property, except in cases stipulated by this Federal law …. " Art. 130 "Evaluation of the debtor's property": "1. During the bankruptcy proceedings, the bankruptcy trustee performs an inventory and appraisal of the property of the debtor.

The Company

27.08.2011
00:49
Comments Off on The Company

This is called positive reinforcement. Of course, the head of the company, undertaking a project to improve the enterprise of resources should be guided only by way of positive motivation or future of the company, which will not cause stress his personal and company employees. Suppose the head of the company created for itself an image of the future of the company is constantly endeavoring to programming it into the subconscious. It is also not an easy task, but entirely dependent on the manager. Suppose he was able to program the subconscious mind of the habit – to believe unconditionally in the ideal enterprise. How to program a habit in the subconscious of his subordinates? Sometimes managers do not even try to take steps to programming the subconscious of his subordinates the ideal picture of the company.

Head thinks he can make the order a subordinate to change their habits. In this case, he will resort to the so-called "negative motivation." Subordinate experiencing much resistance your subconscious will find a thousand reasons to prove that all their old habits and correct them should not be changed. Even those subordinates who are experiencing chronic stress today, will resist changing their habits, as they do not see the end result. And what about those subordinates who are satisfied with the current state of the enterprise. Their subconscious will resist the most. As a result of head face complete lack of understanding and invited a bunch of studies, from which it will follow that leave everything as is – the best solution to date. If the manager does not believe himself finally in the possibility of ideal company, not programmed your subconscious mind to this ideal image – the probability of success of the project change is very small. We have examples of successful projects, where the head, which has certain authority, believes in the outcome of the project changes, and made use of his subordinates are new ways of working.

Numerous Evaluation

05.08.2011
04:48
Comments Off on Numerous Evaluation

As regulates of "expertise" of the evaluation report, and why not its methods of? 5. Why has this regulation, "assessment" report on the assessment? 6. Who needs a MRI examination of evaluation reports? Next, we give answers to these questions. 1. One of the panelists suggested that the availability of the document is important and not matter the status.

Perhaps, in journalism, it is possible, but in professional activities – is not acceptable. Important not only genre document, but its legal status. Recall that there are regulations and regulatory documents, as well as those in the appraiser's evaluation report, which have different legal status of any legal administrative and judicial processes. The false promise of participants has led to false conclusions and false status as MP. Not counting the numerous internal and external conflicts, legal and legal errors, it is fundamentally consistent legal doctrine of Russia and includes many corruption-factors. In addition, the methodological aspect, he does not hold water. Designers MP declaring good intentions associated with bringing order to the estimated activities of expert evaluation reports. We take the liberty to say that these goals – the false, and they were not achieved, because there is no order in the most evaluation.

The form of the document to the guidelines widely known, and it never will happen law. This technique is not even the "expert" research, but only the methodological recommendations of how to implement the operations described in the method. How can we offer guidelines, if there is no technique? 2. NSOD has no legal basis or develop or approve guidelines, because about them in the Act does not say anything. NSOD may develop draft federal standards. At the same time these standards do not need to duplicate the provisions of the Law, since it is profanity. They should be presented techniques and methods and ways of how to assess and "expert" assessment reports.

Powered by WordPress and Artsavius Theme