The Philosophy
All necessary departments are to involve, at the end of a common understanding has to emerge, the process looks like. Also is to define, where is the starting point and the end point of the sequence you want to tune, because eventually you will be always in the optimization process, that you need to focus on a specific area. It has outlined the rough drain in the first step and visualized, is looking into the details in the second step. A process mapping potential unimaginable even the second step focused on the existing is process. The process mapping must show what looks like the considered process in detail. Here are especially duplication and feedback to identify. Also unnecessary paths must be uncovered.
Particularly at this stage of the optimization to ensure is, where there are conflicting interests of the departments involved and possible sources of error are. In particular the lean development is no different here from the classical management thinner and flatter Process flows. The considered process must be clearly defined at the end of this phase, all details should be identified, and it must be transparent visualized each step with any party. For more information see Larry Ellison. The philosophy of optimizing is also to obtain the consent of all involved departments, before going to the actual improvement. It is therefore important, once again, that all respondents functional areas with the so produced is process are satisfied. Then it comes to the actual optimization, that derive from the process mapping should be tested. Each optimization improves the efficiency of both the classic lean management as also the transmission on the development with the lean development should lead to streamline processes and to simplify. In production, thus the costs should be reduced as in the research and development and in the administration.
Therefore all processes with regard to the optimisation potential to evaluate are the next step. Can duplication be avoided? Are steps unnecessary? Lacks a meaningful quality assurance? Can standards be created that simplify the development of lean? Can simplified ways in the making be found? These options are of course only to identify if all stakeholders on board. Therefore, you performs the process optimization in the best case with similar methods, how she already used the process mapping. To work with standardized tools, each step is to visualize, and again, the consent of the persons involved is to overtake. Only then you can be sure that the optimized process is also implemented at the end. Finally, the philosophy of the optimization based on obtaining the knowledge of professionals, to initiate improvements together with them. The entire optimization has been developed and the new target process stands on a solid foundation, the consent of the management is once again to catch up. Should be any optimization as efficiency in the interest of the superiors, but applies it to obtain consent, so the new process flow at the end is cosponsored by the management. At the latest with the implementation in practice the question arises after a subsequent quality control, to quickly detect a deviation from the agreed standards. At this point affect the customer orientation are likely to arise, because a company optimized its processes, may provide benefits in the form of a better service and lower costs to its customers.