Nietzsche

07.10.2018
01:42
Comments Off on Nietzsche

Which are: to make of the most powerful knowledge of the affection (therefore, to consider it as an affection); to deny the free will; to deny the final teleologia and causes; to deny the moral order of the world; to deny the disinterest; to deny the evil. Each one of these item instigates in them, while studious of philosophy, doubly: they are the base of a bold thought, that if opposes to the philosophical tradition of the form most radical, establishing the philosophical interest for the imanncia; e, point that elapses of the first one, for the fact of capsizes more two distant philosophers between itself in two centuries, and still more us, and however to constitute philosophical proposals that in they are, nowadays, extremely current and that they continue being of vanguard. After all, still more of what new points of doctrine, Spinoza and Nietzsche inaugurate new ways to think and of filosofar. Both filosofaram against its time, for a time for coming. Symbol of ousadia and courage. With thoughts that had exceeded interdicted borders of the intellectual knowledge of our time, thus it is the philosophy of Spinoza, in relation to the theological power and politician.

It examined the nature human being and its imaginary one, unmasked as the fear passions and hope are passions established in the doubt. It affirmed that any human being is subject to they. Thus, they they are changedded into powerful tools for sustentation of a sufficiently specific power: the superstition. It says in its workmanship ' ' tica' ' that the fear and the hope are the passions established in the doubt that any human being can have in relation its future, However it is for the ignorance, that if the human one is taken to wander between the fear and the hope. But in such a way one how much the other is fruits of the unfamiliarity.

Comments are closed.