Abandoning nuclear energy

Comments Off on Abandoning nuclear energy

State humana insurance of current nuclear policy in the world. Countries with nuclear reactors in operation and others under construction. Countries build its first reactor. Countries that are considering today the individual insurance construction of new reactors. Countries that are considering building its first reactor. Countries which have reactors but are not considering changes to its current policy. Countries that insurance companies are currently considering dismantling. Countries which have dismantled all its reactors.
Grafenrheinfeld nuclear plant, Germany. It is expected that all German nuclear power plants stopped operating in 2020.
The abandonment of nuclear power is a policy option of allowing to use nuclear energy for electricity generation. The idea in health plans some countries including the closure of existing nuclear power plants. Sweden was the first country insurance plans where it was proposed (1980) (this country is the No. 9A nuclear country that consumes more energy in the world ). Followed Italy (1987), Belgium (1999), Germany (2000) (Germany is the global consumer 4 nuclear energy ) and has been discussed small business insurance in other European countries. Austria, Netherlands, Poland, and Spain enacted legislation that halted construction of new nuclear reactors, although some of them this medical insurance option is being discussed today group insurance (see picture). New Zealand does not group health use nuclear reactors for power generation since 1984. Theoretically the abandonment of nuclear energy should promote the use of renewable energy sources.
Arguments in favor of abandonment
Traditional symbol of opposition to the construction of nuclear plants.
Risk of accidents and terrorism
Based on the German government estimates, using the likelihood of damage to the core that was obtained in 1980 in studies of aetna health German reactor safety of 2.9 10-5 a year, can be calculated that the risk of family medical insurance a fusion of nuclei in a period of 40 years is 16 for Europe and 40 worldwide. For new reactor designs probabilistic safety studies obtained values of between 5 10-7 and 3 10-8. Using these values, the probability of an accident at a nuclear plant that it meant damage to the core in the same way that a serious study for Europe 0.3 or 0.9 for the world healthcare plan in 40 years. The probability that two of these accidents occurred in those 40 years would be a 0.0005 to 0.004 Europe and the world.
With German survey data, the probability that one of these accidents happen in Spain would be 0.005 as a maximum, for a maximum life span of 20 years (the useful life that would detract theoretically the most modern of Spanish nuclear power plants).
The consequences of an accident at a nuclear plant could be serious. The Chernobyl accident was the worst nuclear insurance accident in history. It is advisable to consult the article on the accident, which offers data on the latest reports. Estimates of deaths to date range from the 41 who believe institutions like the IAEA, WHO and others to tens or hundreds of thousands according to others (Greenpeace, TORCH, AIMPGN). Estimates of aetna insurance deaths from accidents (mainly due to an increased incidence of cancer) will also vary in a range dental insurance between 4000 and the tens or hundreds of thousands.
Nuclear plants may be the target of terrorist attacks:
Most nuclear plants were built in the 1960s and 1970s, and like the World Trade Center were designed to withstand the impact of smaller planes. Health insurance is very common in the US, is a health insurance provideroffers a variety of health insurance packagesis an innovative health insurance service companycan reduce your payment on health insurancehas one of the best health insurance plans David Kyd, spokesman for the IAEA, claimed in 2001 that literally “If health plan you postulate the risk of a jumbo jet loaded with fuel, it is clear that the design was not conceived to withstand such impact.” Edwin Lyman, Scientific Director of the Institute of Washington Nuclear Control (USA) notes that “if a commercial plane crashed into a nuclear plant, the reactor would not operate, but the cooling systems could be destroyed. In this case the nuclear fuel rods overheat and produce a steam explosion that could release lethal amounts of radioactivity into the atmosphere. ” There are reports of experiments conducted by the Research Institute of American Electric Power (EPRI) in which these assertions were tested, reaching the conclusion that containment as used in Western nuclear plants could withstand the direct impact of a Boeing 767-400.
The same Dr. Lyman, a member of the Union of health Concerned Scientists, says that “if a well trained team of terrorists managed to enter by force in a nuclear power station within minutes could do enough damage to cause core meltdown and a failure of the containment structure.

Comments are closed.