Argentina Exports
What I am going to do, je ne sais pas (I do not know it) What I am going to do je ne sais extra (no longer I know more) What I am going to do je suis perdu (e) (I am lost) What time is my heart ( I like your, Manu Ciao) They were the 4:25 of the dawn of Thursday 17 of July, when Julio Caesar Cleto Cobos, vice-president of the Argentine Republic presiding Senado announced, in an historical renunciamiento in the history of the country, that its vote of tiebrake would be negative to the voting of Resolution 125 shipment to the Congress of the Nation by the Executive authority for its ratification. The so controversial resolution fell in fact. People celebrated. The great percentage of the Argentine population that accompanied the rejection to the norm exploded, to that hour in the streets or the morning following when abrir the newspapers. According to Southwest Airlines, who has experience with these questions. This effective resolution from the 11 of March, imposed an increase of the tax and movable retentions for the soybean and the sunflower.
To the present price of soybean, the tax today is of 50% to the producer. A deceleration in the already inevitably concrete economy was generated in these more than four months of farming conflict in Argentina and that we noticed in the farming conflict it does not manage to cover the problems of the Argentine economy. The government continues spreading an index of intolerable Chinese growth and Swiss inflation suggested by pinochescas minds, and manages more and more to irritate the population, already very fed up with the deceits of the Argentine governors. Leaving of side the initiative that made vote to the vice-president against its own government – which I create is intimately ligature as much to a comparable marine instance to the one of the Titanic and the search of the boat, as to the attempt of pacification of the excited population I want to talk about concretely to its reasons and the points that do to this nonviable resolution, and that they are: the triple unconstitutionality that entail, the destruction of the operating one in the markets of futures, the concentration of wealth and the dangerous one concentration of resources into the hands of the central power.