in that enslaved family, in day nine of January of 1875, the Benedita takes an act of fury and indignation against the life. It took its son first-born of six years in the arm and treated to shoot it inside of the well in order to drown the child; the boy was to tumble inside in meeting to the death of the well, when that the lack of depth of waters the dexterity of the small one had made with that its life was not cut with a scythe by the fall and thus could survive to the attempted against one. He consists that was to search security in the house Mr. against the maternal act. He would be beside the point bold to make divagaes here regarding the true intentions of Benedita with its murderous act; perhaps she was insane person or he could be wanting to free the son of the servile condition. By the way, the second hypothesis is well reasonable, since the resistance to the slavery involved some modalities to boycott it, even though abortions on the part of slaves who if refused in giving to the light new captive to its gentlemen. In this point it is reasonable to think about the act of Benedita. Perhaps its Mr.
Nistaldo thought the same thing; it could be a reaction directed against the boy of servile future. In such a way thus it was, that the boy immediately was removed of the contact with the mother and was in company Mr. whom he decided to protect it. The too much children of Benedita had continued in its power, probably Mr. did not believe that it would be capable to repeat so great against defenseless children badly so small whose futures were not marked by the fatality of the servitude. But the continuation of the actions of Benedita sample that the future as enslaved was not the factor took that it to want to kill its children.
You can change its life, if want. In the truth, we only presume the utility of our capacity to think. As well as that we are surprised by as many indesejados habits, which go being bred throughout our life, of mansinho, as that without wanting they go if incorporating our day the day. They are installed and they started to be part of our nature. we start to act as animal irrationals. Until today I, really, do not obtain to distinguish right this classification from rational and irrational, already vi animals with deeply reflexivas attitudes and super-rationals, and coexist said people rational human beings who, although great supposedly adult, with attitudes completely irrationals. As to understand.
Of the one to believe that we are being, at least, extremely unjust he stops with the animals and completely deceived about the capacity thinking of the man. Our objective mind, another intricate thing of if understanding: fancy. Realities that in them are very laborious when we discover to be only about a fancy. In a similar way that we need the fancy, stops in some circumstances to be able to understand realities. Confused this. Who said that we need to explain something? What we need exactly is to confuse. Our rational mind can leading in them to live, for an entire life, believing to be real an entire life of irrealidades.
After all what it is real is only what we thus believe to be. S. You take by Aquino, if it ventured in this field trying to show that the Real is only what this as our directions. But and the direction of the others, will be real for them? will be had different of my agreement? What it has this to see with our heading: simple everything: you still withhold the power on its life, you you have the right and more than this she has the obligation of living this life in the way as to want, can believe the realities that what to want, can fantasiar to want, because you have the choice freedom.