Archive for December, 2012

Esplanade

27.12.2012
04:35
Comments Off on Esplanade

After a certain literary recess I came back to write. Puts, I do not write nothing since the end of the last year (years are run and these jokes insanes continue). New year, all new of new. As already it is turning tradition I was for the Esplanade. There abnormalitys had happened (as always) in which story in this text. So that all understand the scene where I was I will cite some important points: 1: It rained the day all and the cavalry was convoked. Pra had coconut all lado.2: For climatic reasons much people gave up to go to make dirty the feet in the gram of the Esplanade and to take a bath of chuva.3: Instead of bands of the fans, the singers alone saw umbrellas I do not know as my cousin obtains, but it gave a cake to me already in first seconds 2010.

There I in the front of palco was hearing ' ' You not valley nothing more I taste of voc' ' (Music that turned subject my familiar film). Mine cunhadinha bound to me and arranged company pra party. Now they were four women and I (my mother I would be proud). I observed the people our front. A couple if kissed.

I noticed that the two used masculine clothes: – Dani. It is impression mine or these two if grasping are two men here? It inquired: – Not They are two women. – A. It has reason It was there that the first more left-hand side thing of the night happened. One galera started to run and people were pack in it. They had been questions of seconds. Thing of Witch of Blair. When we arrive at a good distance I I spoke without breath: – Do that we are running same? – I know there. I prefer not to know.

Heraclitus Parmnides

26.12.2012
08:48
Comments Off on Heraclitus Parmnides

For example, the art of the construction is a power that this absentee in the constructed thing In this way, (it understands that), it harnesses in general means the principle of the change and the movement in one another thing, or the same thing while another one; ‘ ‘ Aristotle with the conception of act and power gave handle to the problem generated for the antithesis between the being is, and not-to be he is. Despite the philosophies Heraclitus and Parmnides to be different, both conceive devir in the same way, therefore they judge that the flow of the beings, or the movement, if carries through as ticket of an act to another act. The current form, stops Aristotle is the essence of a being, therefore, to assume that devir either change of act in act, is the same that to affirm that the dumb essence, becoming another thing, or that the being if becomes what it is not, then, the movement, or devir, is the change of a being in its not-being, or the ticket of the being when not-being and not-being to be. According to Aristotle, if an act if transformed into another act, or a form if it transformed into another form, it would have a contradiction, what it would be the same that to affirm that It is and NOT It, what it is a nonsense. The ticket, therefore, of form some is made of act the act or form the form, but of power the act, being the power what it belongs to the form for its relation with the substance, is comparable with it and it does not destroy it, it materialize but it. For the Areopagita, devir is rational, for the fact of its nucleus, that is the power and not it form, as in maken a mistake way they had believed and they defended the philosophers daily pay-socrticos Heraclitus Parmnides. Devir, therefore, is caused by the substance as potentiality or possibility of forms that if develop and if they reveal in the time.

The materialized form is act that conserves power in its interior. Bibligrafia: Thonnard, F.J. Compendium of history of the philosophy. Society Is Joo Evangelista, 1953. Chaui, Marilena.Introduo the history of the philosophy, the daily pay-socrticos to the Aristotle. Company of the Letters, 2004. Maritain, Jaques. Elements of philosophy – general introduction to the philosophy.

Benedita

25.12.2012
10:56
Comments Off on Benedita

in that enslaved family, in day nine of January of 1875, the Benedita takes an act of fury and indignation against the life. It took its son first-born of six years in the arm and treated to shoot it inside of the well in order to drown the child; the boy was to tumble inside in meeting to the death of the well, when that the lack of depth of waters the dexterity of the small one had made with that its life was not cut with a scythe by the fall and thus could survive to the attempted against one. He consists that was to search security in the house Mr. against the maternal act. He would be beside the point bold to make divagaes here regarding the true intentions of Benedita with its murderous act; perhaps she was insane person or he could be wanting to free the son of the servile condition. By the way, the second hypothesis is well reasonable, since the resistance to the slavery involved some modalities to boycott it, even though abortions on the part of slaves who if refused in giving to the light new captive to its gentlemen. In this point it is reasonable to think about the act of Benedita. Perhaps its Mr.

Nistaldo thought the same thing; it could be a reaction directed against the boy of servile future. In such a way thus it was, that the boy immediately was removed of the contact with the mother and was in company Mr. whom he decided to protect it. The too much children of Benedita had continued in its power, probably Mr. did not believe that it would be capable to repeat so great against defenseless children badly so small whose futures were not marked by the fatality of the servitude. But the continuation of the actions of Benedita sample that the future as enslaved was not the factor took that it to want to kill its children.

Changing Life

01.12.2012
01:48
Comments Off on Changing Life

You can change its life, if want. In the truth, we only presume the utility of our capacity to think. As well as that we are surprised by as many indesejados habits, which go being bred throughout our life, of mansinho, as that without wanting they go if incorporating our day the day. They are installed and they started to be part of our nature. we start to act as animal irrationals. Until today I, really, do not obtain to distinguish right this classification from rational and irrational, already vi animals with deeply reflexivas attitudes and super-rationals, and coexist said people rational human beings who, although great supposedly adult, with attitudes completely irrationals. As to understand.

Of the one to believe that we are being, at least, extremely unjust he stops with the animals and completely deceived about the capacity thinking of the man. Our objective mind, another intricate thing of if understanding: fancy. Realities that in them are very laborious when we discover to be only about a fancy. In a similar way that we need the fancy, stops in some circumstances to be able to understand realities. Confused this. Who said that we need to explain something? What we need exactly is to confuse. Our rational mind can leading in them to live, for an entire life, believing to be real an entire life of irrealidades.

After all what it is real is only what we thus believe to be. S. You take by Aquino, if it ventured in this field trying to show that the Real is only what this as our directions. But and the direction of the others, will be real for them? will be had different of my agreement? What it has this to see with our heading: simple everything: you still withhold the power on its life, you you have the right and more than this she has the obligation of living this life in the way as to want, can believe the realities that what to want, can fantasiar to want, because you have the choice freedom.

Powered by WordPress and Artsavius Theme